Today's Conservative Outrage
One of the things that is most tiring about being right-wing in modern America is having to put up with the conservative press' "outrage piece o' the day" in which some lame example of PC or thoughtless government action is held up as confirmation that We Are The Way and The Truth.
It's just as tiresome as the Left's similar process and no more enlightening.
But what really gets me is when it betrays the type of blindness that today's Liberal-Right has become famous for.
Take NRO for example. Today it and much of the right-of-center blogosphere is focusing on the latest weasel words out of the mouth of a British minister. The report setting off the fury is as follows:
Of course, what's actually interesting about this is not the well of outrage it is supposed to invoke, but that, so far as I know, not one of the oh-so-conservative commentators has bothered to point out that this minister is saying absolutely nothing that has not been the oft-stated policy of President George Bush and the Government of the United States from almost the moment the Twin Towers were felled.
As President Bush said upon rushing immediately to a mosque after the attacks of 9.11.
Remarks of the President before the Islamic Center of Washington, D.C., September 17, 2001:
This is no different in substance from what the Home Secretary has said.
But don't expect today's blinkered "conservatives" to notice, let alone tell you that.
It's just as tiresome as the Left's similar process and no more enlightening.
But what really gets me is when it betrays the type of blindness that today's Liberal-Right has become famous for.
Take NRO for example. Today it and much of the right-of-center blogosphere is focusing on the latest weasel words out of the mouth of a British minister. The report setting off the fury is as follows:
Government renames Islamic terrorism as 'anti-Islamic activity' to woo Muslims
Ministers have adopted a new language for declarations on Islamic terrorism.
In future, fanatics will be referred to as pursuing "anti-Islamic activity".
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said that extremists were behaving contrary to their faith, rather than acting in the name of Islam.
Security officials believe that directly linking terrorism to Islam is inflammatory, and risks alienating mainstream Muslim opinion.
Of course, what's actually interesting about this is not the well of outrage it is supposed to invoke, but that, so far as I know, not one of the oh-so-conservative commentators has bothered to point out that this minister is saying absolutely nothing that has not been the oft-stated policy of President George Bush and the Government of the United States from almost the moment the Twin Towers were felled.
As President Bush said upon rushing immediately to a mosque after the attacks of 9.11.
Remarks of the President before the Islamic Center of Washington, D.C., September 17, 2001:
Like the good folks standing with me, the American people were appalled and outraged at last Tuesday's attacks. And so were Muslims all across the world. Both Americans and Muslim friends and citizens, tax-paying citizens, and Muslims in nations were just appalled and could not believe what we saw on our TV screens.
These acts of violence against innocents violate the fundamental tenets of the Islamic faith. And it's important for my fellow Americans to understand that.
The English translation is not as eloquent as the original Arabic, but let me quote from the Koran, itself: In the long run, evil in the extreme will be the end of those who do evil. For that they rejected the signs of Allah and held them up to ridicule.
The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam. That's not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These terrorists don't represent peace. They represent evil and war.
This is no different in substance from what the Home Secretary has said.
But don't expect today's blinkered "conservatives" to notice, let alone tell you that.


