Saturday, August 12, 2006

Yeah, But Does He Read New Sisyphus?


AFP reports:
Bush reads Camus's 'The Stranger' on ranch vacation
Aug 11 7:14 PM US/Eastern

US President George W. Bush quoted French existential writer Albert Camus to European leaders a year and a half ago, and now he's read one of his most famous works: "The Stranger."

White House spokesman Tony Snow said Friday that Bush, here on his Texas ranch enjoying a 10-day vacation from Washington, had made quick work of the Algerian-born writer's 1946 novel -- in English.

The US president, often spoofed as an intellectual lightweight, quoted Camus in a February 21, 2005 speech in Brussels praising the US-Europe alliance and urging other nations to help Washington spread democracy in the world.

"We know there are many obstacles, and we know the road is long. Albert Camus said that 'freedom is a long-distance race.' We're in that race for the duration," Bush said in those remarks.

Personally, I would recomment Camus' "Letters to a German Friend" as more fitting our current time, but I'm pleased nonetheless.

UPDATE I: The President is spotted reading The Stranger the same week it is reported that legendary NASCAR driver Jean Girard was spotted reading The Stranger while driving.

Coincidence? I think not.

Friday, August 11, 2006

Heather MacDonald's Shocking Secret Revealed!

For every conservative, there is a story of how he or she became one. Oh, I've known one or two people out there who have been conservative forever, but not that many. Most people I know who are men and women of the right have traveled some distance to be there. The wisdom of the old chestnut (sometimes attributed to Churchill, sometimes to Clemenceau, other times to others) was this: if you are not a socialist at 20, you have no heart; if you are not a conservative by 40, you have no head.

Every time I read a piece by a prominent conservative, I wonder to myself: what was it for them? What event happened in their life? What did they see? How, exactly, was their heart broken in the beginning of wisdom?

Well, in one case, I think I've figured it out. Today I ran across an old interview with Heather MacDonald. There is the following exchange:
Luke: "How old were you when you got your drivers license?"

Heather: "Probably 21 or 22. I refused to learn how to drive growing up because I was so anti-car. I was such an environmentalist. Finally, after college, my father put his foot and said, 'You must learn how to drive.' I got my license but then I never really used it. I drove only one year, in 1985, when I lived in Los Angeles and clerked for federal judge Stephen Reinhardt downtown. So my skills are basic and unused."


Yup. Having to work for Judge Reinhardt.

If that doesn't do it, nothing will.

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

The Cultural Tide is Turning

I have long held that one of the benefits of having Islamic Fascists for enemies is that they are the kind of men who are so sure of themselves and their cause that they are largely unable to lie about what their goals are and how they intend to meet them.

Oh, there are exceptions. Ibrahim Hooper and his fellow "civil rights" activists of the fascist front-group CAIR spring to mind. And, of course, taqiyya isn't a Wikipedia entry for nothing.

On balance, however, most Islamists believe their cause to be so just, so obvious and so in line with the yearning of human beings that they see no real need to hide what they believe. That impulse, combined with the aggressive confidence on display across the Islamic Civilization right now, leads them to say what they mean and mean what they say.

Why is this a good thing for the West?

It is good because of the illusions it dispells and the evidence it becomes. For every "we can negotiate with these people" speech that comes from any governments' spokesman, people are seeing claims from Islamists being reported that state quite clearly that there is nothing to negotiate about: convert or die. And even the large cultural bias in favor of peace and reconciliation, especially in Europe, has a hard time running true to form when the evidence mounts daily about what it is that we face.

When jihadis are arrested in Canada planning to plant bombs and behead the Prime Minster in the House of Commons and the Canadian press and police state that the plotters come from a "broad strata of society" with very little in common, that is one thing.

The fact that to the average person the links between those arrested are as clear as day is quite another. The one overwhelms the other; people quite rightly assume that the police and government are saying that because they *have* to and that no one really believes that.

Further, the aggressively violent statements and actions of the arrested mens' relations on the first day of court proceedings are so honest--and so over the top--that the police and government characterization of the case is dismissed out of hand by the vast majority of people listening.

And, now, with the propaganda campaign in full swing, more and more people--not the true believers, not the conservatives, not us wingnuts--of average, everyday, non-jihadi obsessed natures are beginning to ask themselves: who are these people, what the hell do they want and why are they living here?

Everyday, between the doom and the gloom of the news and the blogs, I see more rays of light, more reasons to be hopeful that our collective full use of the blessings of freedom of speech over the past years is finally bearing fruit.

The latest example of this is an article that can be found in the current issue of the left-wing L.A. Weekly. It is (and I don't say this lightly) required reading. An excerpt (you can find the full article here):
In exposing Hajj's manipulations, Johnson has raised the lid on a potential Pandora's box. Namely, how our leading news agencies and newspapers increasingly rely on stringers from hostile nations to tell us how we, or our allies, behave in wartime. Since you'd be hard-pressed to find Muslims in the U.S., let alone Europe, who aren't strongly anti-Israel and opposed to any American presence in the Middle East whatsoever, why on earth would you expect to find neutral Arab reporters in Baghdad or Beirut? This is the kind of question newspaper editors should be asking themselves (and their stringers). If the implications of this are followed through, or if more photographers like Adnan "Photoshop" Hajj are discovered, the ramifications are likely to be significant. In helping bring Hajj's smoke-and-mirrors game to light, Johnson has performed a great service.

The people who read the L.A. Weekly do not want to hear this. But, at the same time, a good number of them are people of high intelligence. And, some number of them will look into the matter themselves.

And more and more, as the CAIR spokesmen are given a free pass, as our media continues to gloss over the mania in the Islamic world, as our governments tell us there is nothing to worry about except failing in our duty to embrace diversity, as our law enforcement officials rush to tell us the latest massacre of Jewish women in the United States was not terrorism, people are going to start asking themselves:

Despite what I keep on hearing, when a people keep telling me they are going to kill me and desire my and my country's destruction, shouldn't I believe them?

Shouldn't we stop them?

And in that way, our forces grow daily.

It's Cool, It's Cool

When I was growing up in Los Angeles County, I noticed something peculiar about the behavior of louts, thugs, bullies and a-holes. When they held the advantage--in numbers, position, power, etc.--they acted very aggressively. They pushed, pulled, punched, insulted and provoked, all to advance their status as big men. There was no victim too helpless, no decent person who could not be stomped on and laughed at.

But, a funny thing happened to them when they were challenged.

When challenged, when a person these idiots were pushing decided they had been pushed too far, or, as happened often, when the situation changed as the person being bullied was unexpectedly reinforced by the chance arrival of six of his best friends, the bully's behavior changed.

Then, the tables having been turned, the bully having been caught red-handed trying to bluster and threaten someone, the thug would turn to the larger audience and, hands up around his chest, say "it's cool, it's cool." And he would back off.

Of course, nothing was cool. Nothing about the thug had changed except that he had acted like a weasel when he got caught out. A second ago, he was shouting and strutting around to all within range.

Now, he mumbles "it's cool" and backs slowly away, hoping no one says "no, it's not cool" and holds him truly accountable.

In today's "Corrections" column in the New York Times, we find this:
A picture caption with an audio slide show on July 27 about an Israeli attack on a building in Tyre, Lebanon, imprecisely described the situation in the picture. The man pictured, who had been seen in previous images appearing to assist with the rescue effort, was injured during that rescue effort, not during the initial attack, and was not killed.

The correct description was this one, which appeared with that picture in the printed edition of The Times: After an Israeli airstrike destroyed a building in Tyre, Lebanon, yesterday, one man helped another who had fallen and was hurt.

Let me translate that for you:

"It's cool, it's cool."

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

The Signs Didn't Say "Sore Loserman" For Nothing

Senator Lieberman has just lost the Democratic primary in Connecticut. Unlike most conservatives, I say good for those Connecticut democrats. The fact is that given his position on the Iraq War, Joe Lieberman is not a fit representative for the Democrats of that fine state.

A lot will be said about this race in the times ahead, and, already, the good folks at NRO and on Fox News are playing up what an out-of-control lefty Lamont is. But, I take the long view.

The War on Terror, the upcoming war that is brewing just as sure as if today was 1932, will not be won unless the American people are united. And, right now, only about 30% of Americans (I'm guessing, but I don't think that is far off) are on board.

What will have to happen to unite the country is not, as many expect, more attacks on our soil. No, what will have to happen is that liberals and leftists will have to be given an opportunity to deal with the enemy from a position of power. Only when liberals and leftists realize that there is no negotiating with the enemy and that there is more holding us back from peace and love and joy than mean ol' Karl Rove will we be properly united.

So, let us have men like Lamont, who think they can offer "incentives" to the fascists of Tehran. Let him try.

In the short run, I couldn't help but notice something very, very funny about Kos' reaction:
While this race isn't officially over, it's pretty much over. Lieberman just announced that he is running as an independent.

I know Democrats in DC, including many of Lieberman's allies, are horrified at that possibility. Lieberman will tell them all to fuck off. He doesn't care. He doesn't care about promises he made to them to respect the will of the primary voters.

Lieberman's original rationale for collecting signatures was that only 20 percent of Democrats would vote in a summer primary. Well, we got a blockbuster primary turnout. While only about 3 percent of Democrats voted in the Virginia primary a few weeks ago, about 50 percent will have participated today. That's an incredible number -- unprecedented -- for a Senate primary. I'll leave others to do the historical research, but this isn't normal. This is what people-power looks like, and it is changing the face of politics.

Now, Lieberman wants to stab his allies and his party in the back. It won't be the first time.

Here's what we all need to do the next few days:

1. Push Harry Reid to strip Lieberman of all committee assignments.

2. Let people know what a sore loser Lieberman is.

3. Get all Democrats -- including Bill Clinton -- to publicly back Ned Lamont.

4. Get the Democratic interest groups who backed Lieberman to switch allegiances in the general.

Let people know???

Monday, August 07, 2006

Europe Saves The Day, Part II

As I mentioned below, Israel responded to the European Union's call for a cease-fire and an international force in Southern Lebanon brilliantly. Basically, the Government of Israel said in response "Excellent idea! How quickly can you be here?"

Turns out, you'll be shocked to hear, that talking about an issue and issuing demands are one thing. Actually having to put your money and your citizens lives on the line is quite another.
A senior German official said he would not favor a "directly military" role for Berlin in an international force in Lebanon, citing the weight of his country's history, according to an interview published Monday.

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said last week that he would favor German participation. However, officials from Chancellor Angela Merkel down - mindful of the Nazi-era past - have trodden carefully, saying that Germany cannot consider a contribution until a UN mandate is in place.

Gernor Erler, a deputy foreign minister, stressed that stance and noted that the mandate likely also would address Lebanon's rebuilding, according to an interview with the daily Die Welt.

"It is conceivable that German soldiers could be used to train Lebanese
forces, or that experts could be used for policing tasks," Erler was quoted as telling the newspaper - echoing a possibility that Merkel has raised.

Ah, yes, the good, old European offer to provide "training".

Let's strip the week-end of the fog of war as well as the noise and smoke of the propaganda war and state what we *know* as absolute fact:

-- Despite its push for an international force to separate the belligerents in Lebanon, other than France no EU nation has actually offered troops.

-- Despite its worrisome, joint U.S./France origin, the draft U.N. resolution circulating at the Security Council has been loudly and completely denounced by Hezbollah, Lebanon and puppet-master Iran.

-- After a slow start, the IDF has committed significant ground troops to the battle.

-- Hezbollah's man in charge of inter-Arab affairs has formally asked all Arab governments to join it in asking for an immediate cease-fire.

-- Anti-Israel propaganda has gone so far over the top that even the usual suspects are beginning to take notice.

-- Reuters has been caught red-handed Photoshopping war images in an effort to make Israel look "disproportionate"....and has had to admit it.

Add it up, ladies and gentlemen, and what do you get?

This war, unlike past Arab-Israeli wars, is not ending any time soon, there will be no international force, the jihadi propaganda machine is finally--finally!--running out of steam and during the whole process...the IDF continues to eat up Hezbollah, which is now frantically searching for a cease-fire and an exit.

Excellent.

UPDATE I: Rich Lowry has posted an update at the Corner regarding an insider's take on the on-going negotiations at the United Nations:
Was just talking to someone who is watching the U.N. business closely. This observer's guess is that the U.S.-French compromise is going to go down. The Arab League came close to voting against it today, but is instead sending a delegation to New York to harangue everyone tomorrow. Because we are so worried about the Lebanese government falling, the resolution will probably be re-negotiated, heading in the direction of calling for an Israeli withdrawal and embracing stronger language on Shebaa Farms and on a prisoner exchange. Even then, Hezbollah seems unlikely to accept it. The basic problem is that there is a deep division over ultimate goals—we want a change to the status quo, a lot of the other players just want Israel out, regardless. The French were willing to play along with us, because they want to preserve their traditional influence over Lebanon. But they probably didn't realize how good a deal we had gotten from them on the draft and probably are taken aback by the Arab reaction. The good news is that the total collapse of the resolution would at least allow Israel to keep hitting Hezbollah.


Double excellent.